A rail safety issue
As a former resident and long time observer of your community I'm surprised and a bit embarrassed about the gridlock and animosity that seems to plague much of the local decision making process.
In 1990, I attempted to convince Phil Anderson, a former mayor, that a "whistle free" zone would be a real benefit to the community. Since railroad traffic moves slower through Staples than other communities, I reasoned, it would allow train crews ample time to alert vehicles and pedestrians of impending danger. Mr. Anderson thought it was a bad idea.
Regardless of the redundancy that has been built into the crossing safety system over the years, industry insiders are continually amazed at the lengths individuals will go to end their lives. Some traverse high fences, others drive headlong into oncoming trains. Last year one individual placed his neck delicately under the rolling boxcar wheel. So be it. It's time for the naysayers of Staples to take a collective leap of faith and embrace this quiet zone concept.
For too long polite, patient leaders of the community have been duped by unscrupulous corporate salesmen in concert with federal and state officials. Government largess for underpasses and other special projects curiously ends up in the politically connected communities.
Trains currently operate at high speeds without whistles through Sartell, St. Cloud and Coon Rapids. Likewise, whistles are prohibited in Fargo, Moorhead and Little Falls. Why not Staples?
Here is an opportunity for the community to get really incensed about an issue together. I envision a grand coalition of red necks, anarchists, mad mothers and leftists filling the streets of Staples and demanding an end to this foolishness that has bedeviled the city for too long.
The city council should proclaim Railroad Days 2010 as the deadline. Succeed in your mission by then. You don't want to become another community that talks big, debates long and does little.
Charles Huff
Fargo, N.D.











